Skip to main content

Do You Have More Chickens Or Pigs?

 




By: Ray Chelstowski / Hilton Barbour

You’ve likely heard the metaphor about the chicken and the pig discussing breakfast. The chicken says “I really like a classic bacon and eggs breakfast.” The pigs turns to the chicken and says “No doubt. You’re involved but I’m committed.”

Simply put, successfully managing (and growing) any membership program boils down to two key considerations: member acquisition and member churn. Even more simply put: Increase the former. Reduce the latter.

Put another way, do you have more (partially) involved chickens or more (fully) committed pigs?

As we discussed last week the most urgent challenge that most loyalty programs face today is churn. So, before customers cycle out of these programs engaging them is critical. Here’s why:

Engaged members stay 4 more years compared with non-engaged members.

Engaged members spend 22% more than non-engaged members.

Member engagement not only increases member loyalty, but also creates referrals.

Programs with a loyalty engagement plan increase membership renewals by 51%.


The more engaged members are the more loyal they become, and the more loyal members are, the longer they'll stay. That’s a virtuous, and endless, circle. The best way to achieve their commitment is by creating the kind of value customers can only discover through you. One way to do that is through collaborative commerce. With collaborative commerce, brands enter into a strategic collaboration with other non-competitive businesses. Businesses that share a common business outcome – say retention – share common audiences but seek to bring new, different rewards to the table. At Kognitiv, we have seen these collaborations – these partnerships - become even more compelling when they put the consumer’s interests ahead of traditional alignments that a brand might consider relevant. These partnerships are developed through a review of shared data as opposed to intuition or industry alliances and connect more closely to the individual consumer’s wants or needs. Personally, I am a member of both the Nordstrom rewards program and Ace Hardware’s loyalty plan - two organizations that couldn’t be further apart in the minds of most consumers. However, the cumulative information they would have on me would allow them to create rewards and offers that no other stand-alone loyalty program could ever match. Now think about adding a third brand, or a fourth, or a fifth. Now consider the unique, unmatched rewards and programs you could unlock. And, because these occur on the Kognitiv PaaS platform, you can unlock and scale these partnerships faster than the months you’d historically need poring over legal contract fine-print.

If you want committed, versus casual involved, customers then you need to exceed the very high bar of relevance and uniqueness. The ability – and the agility – of collaborative commerce is a sure-fire way to unlock that capability.

ray.chelstowski@kognitiv.com

hilton.barbour@kognitiv.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Loyalty Shouldn't Start - or End - at Checkout

  When uncertainty runs high, restaurants often fall back on traditional loyalty programs like a safety net. Points. Punch cards. Discounts dressed up as “engagement.” But the uncomfortable truth is this: loyalty as we’ve known it is wearing thin. What once felt rewarding now feels routine. Predictable. Transactional. Customers are asked to trade data for discounts, frequency for freebies - reduced to behaviors instead of people. These programs may keep customers close, but they rarely make them feel connected. In some cases, they even feel like a trap: buy more to get less that actually matters. Today, brand love isn’t earned through discounts. It’s earned through devotion. The brands winning right now don’t treat loyalty as a program -they treat it as a relationship. They invite customers into the story. They create moments worth remembering. They move beyond transactions and build emotional equity by recognizing customers not just as consumers, but as participants, insider...

Personalization Isn’t a Tactic. It’s a Growth Strategy.

  In crowded categories, brand loyalty is fragile. When new competitors enter the shelf, especially premium challengers, the instinct is often to respond with price cuts, bigger promotions, or louder messaging. But price doesn’t build loyalty. Relevance does. That’s where personalization changes the game. When Pepperidge Farm faced expected sales pressure from Dave's Killer Bread entering the market, the challenge wasn’t just competitive. It was emotional. How do you reinforce loyalty among long-term buyers — primarily female heads of household making bread decisions for their families — in a category where new options constantly surface? You don’t shout louder. You connect deeper. The Personalization Insight Moms are often the primary grocery decision-makers. They’re busy. They’re stretched. And when it comes to self-care, they’re usually the last person they prioritize. The insight was simple but powerful: If you want her attention - and her wallet - offer somet...

Winning Brands Get Fit Through Experiences

Stop discounting. Start reallocating. Fit-to-Win brands cut smarter and invest in experiences that drive real momentum. And, see how Tommy Hilfiger pivoted from rebates to experiences and lifted same period sales by 84%.   Get Your Brand Fit to Win: Cut Smarter. Grow Faster. In a low-volume-growth world, most brands default to defensive cost cutting. Trim budgets. Reduce spend. Protect margin. But the brands that outperform don’t just cut costs - they get fit to win . Being “fit” means identifying and eliminating cost burdens that don’t create growth or competitive advantage. Being “fit to win” means reallocating those freed-up dollars into bold commercial bets that unlock top-line momentum. This isn’t austerity. It’s optimization with intent. When done right, this approach can reduce expenses by as much as 30 percent — while simultaneously strengthening brand equity and accelerating revenue. The question isn’t where can we cut? It’s where are we spending ...